Harmony Tan vs Julie Belgraver Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Sep at 02:05 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Tan vs J. Belgraver

FRA
1
Win
Played
1
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Tan 1 - 1 Belgraver
They have played 5 sets in total, with Harmony Tan winning 3 and Julie Belgraver winning 2. The last match between Harmony Tan and Julie Belgraver was at the W50 Leiria, 04-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Harmony Tan getting the victory 6-2 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tan | 1 |
| Belgraver | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) W50 Leiria(09-04-25)
(R2) W35 Manchester(02-19-25)
H. Tan vs J. Belgraver H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $638,698 | Career Prize Money | $43,000 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 11 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Tan vs J. Belgraver Match Preview:
- How do the players compare in second serve performance? Tan has secured 40.14% of points on their second serve in the last 6 months, while Belgraver has managed 44.13%. This gives Belgraver an edge in second serve reliability.
- Looking at return game stats, Tan has won 49.15% of opponent's second serve points recently, slightly behind Belgraver's 49.59%. However, Tan leads in first serve returns with 31.25% compared to Belgraver's 30.01%.
- Under pressure, Belgraver showcases better performance, saving 56.89% of breakpoints versus Tan's 50.37%. Does this imply Belgraver copes better with high-pressure situations?
- From a performance overview perspective, Tan has a slight edge over the past year with a win rate of 61.11%, narrowly surpassing Belgraver's 60.61%.
- Tan excels on Grass with a 63% win rate but struggles on Clay with 50%. In contrast, Belgraver's best surface is Hard courts with a 63% win rate, and like Tan, finds Clay challenging at 52%.
- How does opponent quality impact predictability? Tan's opponents had an average rank of 362.81, whereas Belgraver faced slightly stronger opponents with an average rank of 324.91.
- Regarding end-of-match tension, Belgraver seems more successful in deciding sets, winning 71% compared to Tan's 53%, which can be crucial in tight matches.
- Break point conversion indicates Belgraver's advantage, as they have capitalized on 44.27% of opportunities versus Tan's 38.06%.
- In terms of player level over the past year, Tan has a better win rate of 63.77% in Challengers/ITF tournaments compared to Belgraver's 61.9%.
Editorial Prediction (September 4, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents a close contest between Tan and Belgraver. While Tan shows proficiency in first serve returns and overall match wins in the past year, Belgraver edges out in several critical aspects.
Belgraver's advantage in second serve performance, superior breakpoint conversion, and resilience under pressure suggest better suitability for crucial match stages. Additionally, their success in deciding sets can be a determining factor in this encounter.
Considering all the stats, Belgraver appears to hold a slight advantage, making them the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Harmony Tan vs Julie Belgraver Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Tan vs J. Belgraver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 28 | Games Won | 27 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Tan Recent Matches Played
J. Belgraver Recent Matches Played

H. Tan vs J. Belgraver Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.52% (392/314) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.40% (159/128) |
| 55.41% (875/704) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.54% (348/302) |
| 52.67% (7329/6586) | Games Win/Loss | 51.54% (3036/2855) |
| 56.47% (131/101) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.21% (71/45) |
| 50.39% (130/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.75% (59/55) |
| 60.22% (112/74) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.88% (29/28) |
| 63.33% (19/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1119 | Aces Total | 831 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1223 | Total Double Faults | 973 |
| 1:13:42 | Average Match Time | 1:34:42 |
| 491.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 458.4 |
| 58% (21228/36626) | 1st Serve % | 56% (10044/18080) |
| 63% (13332/21228) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6521/10044) |
| 46% (7033/15398) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3665/8036) |
| 50% (2273/4555) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1020/2120) |
| 46% (16535/35592) | Return Points Win % | 45% (8053/17983) |
| 38.89% (14/22) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.62% (26/35) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 55.88% (252/199) | Challenger W/L | 52.66% (89/80) |
| 64.86% (96/52) | Futures W/L | 60.53% (69/45) |
| 57% (385/680) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (157/281) |
| 10% (1/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (62/119) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (25/49) |
| 49% (86/175) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (50/82) |
| 86% (396/342) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (158/137) |
| 13% (396/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (158/21) |
| 16% (309/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (129/21) |